MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007573128 · doi:10.3166/jesa.43.789-803

Modélisation et intégration du diagnostic actif dans une architecture embarquée

2009· article· fr· W2007573128 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Élodie Chanthery, Yannick Pencolé

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicPetri Nets in System Modeling
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyComputer scienceHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents some principles for self-maintenanc e in an on-board architecture that embeds on-line active diagnosis. The objective of acti ve diagnosis is to find an action plan that refines the diagnosis without radically changing t he mission plan. This leads to the definition of a planning problem that relies on anactive diagnoser. According to a decision criterion, the aim is then to find the best conditional plan toreach a diagnosable region of the active diagnoser. The interactions problems between the re sult of the planning for diagnosis and the mission planning are then detailed and a solution tha t uses the execution controller of the on-board architecture is proposed. The execution contr ol is specified with Petri nets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicPetri Nets in System ModelingFrench-language works237,207