MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007585924 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2010.5537954

Rapid design space exploration for multi parametric optimization of VLSI designs

2010· article· en· W2007585924 on OpenAlex
Anirban Sengupta, Reza Sedaghat, Zhipeng Zeng

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDesign space explorationComputer scienceMaximizationMinificationParametric statisticsMulti-objective optimizationVery-large-scale integrationProcess (computing)Pareto principleAccelerationMathematical optimizationEmbedded systemMachine learningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Design Space Exploration (DSE) is one of the most important stages in High Level Synthesis designing methodology. This paper presents a novel DSE approach for the current generation of systems with heterogeneous multi parametric optimization objectives. The method introduced in this paper is capable of concurrently resolving multiple conflicting issues encountered during DSE, such as maximization of accuracy needed in the evaluation of design space with minimization in time expended to explore the best architecture. Results of the proposed method for different benchmarks indicated significant acceleration in exploration process compared to another existing approach that is also based on Pareto optimal analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.335
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVLSI and FPGA Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207