Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article a pour objet l'étude, en tant que «mouvement social sexué», du mouvement des chômeurs et des chômeuses qui s'est développé en France au cours de l'hiver 1998. Après avoir revisité une certaine sociologie des mouvements sociaux au nom de la transversalité des rapports sociaux - et plus spécifiquement des rapports sociaux de sexe -, l'auteur rend compte de son observation participante au mouvement des chômeurs et des chômeuses de Morlaix (Bretagne). Il analyse la sous-représentation des chômeuses dans celui-ci et la sexuation des comportements au sein des assemblées générales. Il s'interroge sur les liens entre rapports sociaux de sexe et structure, revendications et modes d'action du mouvement. Puis il examine l'hypothèse de la «haine de genre» à partir de ce mouvement social. La prégnance de la domination masculine et les comportements patriarcaux ne doivent-ils pas être considérés comme des facteurs explicatifs centraux de la progressive démobilisation des participantes et participants à un mouvement social?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".