Viscoelastic Modeling of the Contact Interaction Between a Tactile Sensor and an Atrial Tissue
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modeling and parameter identification of soft tissue are essential in establishing an accurate contact model for tool-tissue interaction, which can be used in the development of high-fidelity surgical instruments. This paper discusses the interaction between a tissue and a tactile sensor in minimally invasive surgery, the focus being a novel technique for robotic-assisted mitral valve repair, in which tactile sensors are used to distinguish between different kinds of tissue by their relative softness. A discrete viscoelastic model is selected to represent the tissue behavior. To populate the model of the tissue with actual data, a set of tissue-testing experiments is designed and implemented on the atrial tissue of a swine heart by analyzing its dynamic response. By means of a genetic algorithm, data of the complex compliance are extracted and used to find the coefficients of the model. Further, a viscoelastic contact model is developed to model the interaction between the tissue and the tactile sensor with annular shape. Finally, the relation among the indentation displacement, the ratio of the radii, and the applied force is established parametrically.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".