MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007722011 · doi:10.1016/j.jglr.2012.09.002

The perils of using sedimentary phosphorus concentrations for inferring long-term changes in lake nutrient levels: Comments on Hiriart-Baer et al., 2011

2012· article· en· W2007722011 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Brian K. Ginn, Kathleen M. Rühland, Joelle D. Young, Jessica Hawryshyn, Roberto Quinlan, Peter J. Dillon, John P. Smol

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Great Lakes Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsTrent UniversityMinistry of EnvironmentMinistry of the Environment, Conservation and ParksQueen's UniversityYork UniversityLake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEutrophicationEnvironmental scienceNutrientClimate changeEcologyFreshwater ecosystemEcosystemMicrocystisAlgal bloomEnvironmental changeBiologyPhytoplanktonCyanobacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.053
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.167
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0530.167
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.023
Scholarly communication0.0050.012
Open science0.0120.004
Research integrity0.0270.037
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Great Lakes ResearchSame topicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsFrench-language works237,207