MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007727651 · doi:10.1186/1748-7161-2-s1-p10

Non invasive evaluation of SpineCor brace correction from surface topography

2007· article· en· W2007727651 on OpenAlexaff
Nancy Shawfaty, Farida Cheriet, Christine Coillard, Souad Rhalmi, Hubert Labelle, Charles H. Rivard

Bibliographic record

VenueScoliosis · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalPolytechnique MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBraceMedicineOrthopedic surgerySurface (topology)OrthodonticsSurgeryEngineeringGeometryMechanical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Study design Inspeck 3D digitizers were used to acquire the external without-brace and with-brace trunk of fifteen patients. On both acquisitions, anatomical landmarks were identified. Using landmark based elastic registration, the in-brace surface is obtained by transforming the without-brace trunk into the with-brace trunk. To quantify the external trunk correction, indices of torso asymmetry are extracted from the without-brace and the in-brace surface. The external correction is then correlated to thoracic and vertebral rotations determined from three-dimensional reconstruction of the spine and rib cage from multiple Xray images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScoliosisSame topicSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207