MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007730975 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.092203

Structural model and electronic structure of the icosahedral<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ga</mml:mi><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pd</mml:mi><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mn</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>quasicrystal

2005· article· lv· W2007730975 on OpenAlexaff
Eeuwe S. Zijlstra, S. K. Bose, J. Dolinšek

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2005
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuasicrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIcosahedral symmetryQuasicrystalCrystallographyPhysicsCondensed matter physicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The structural model and the electronic structure of a newly discovered $i\text{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{Al}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Ga}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Pd}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Mn}$ icosahedral quasicrystal with composition ${\mathrm{Al}}_{67}{\mathrm{Ga}}_{4}{\mathrm{Pd}}_{21}{\mathrm{Mn}}_{8}$ were studied by density functional methods. Calculations are based on the Quandt-Elser periodic approximant model of $i\text{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{Al}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Pd}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Mn}$, which was fully relaxed. To determine which Al sites in the $i\text{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{Al}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Ga}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Pd}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Mn}$ are occupied by Ga, total energies were compared, showing that Ga substitutes two of the aluminum glue atoms, ${\mathrm{Al}}_{5}$ and ${\mathrm{Al}}_{6}$, but no Al atoms that are part of a Bergman cluster. Since only specific Al sites are substituted by Ga, $i\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Al}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Ga}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Pd}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Mn}$ is predicted to be a true quaternary quasicrystal, structurally isomorphous with $i\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Al}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Pd}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Mn}$. Calculation of the electronic density of states of $i\text{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{Al}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Ga}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Pd}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Mn}$ and its comparison to $i\text{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{Al}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Pd}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Mn}$ predicts that 4% $\mathrm{Al}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\mathrm{Ga}$ substitution in the $i\text{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{Al}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Pd}\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{Mn}$ lattice should have negligible influence on the electronic properties of this quasicrystal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicQuasicrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207