MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007752594 · doi:10.1139/o01-079

Induction of apoptosis in HT29 human intestinal epithelial cells by the cytotoxic enterotoxin of <i>Aeromonas hydrophila</i>

2001· article· en· W2007752594 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rosabel Falcón Márquez, Hernandes F. Carvalho, Paulo Pinto Joazeiro, Maria Sílvia Viccari Gatti, Tomomasa Yano

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAquaculture disease management and microbiota
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsAeromonas hydrophilaCytotoxic T cellEnterotoxinBiologyAerolysinApoptosisMicrobiologyAgarose gel electrophoresisDNA fragmentationMolecular biologyIn vitroProgrammed cell deathDNABiochemistryBacteriaEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cytotoxic enterotoxin produced by Aeromonas hydrophila is considered to be the main virulence factor in gastrointestinal infections mediated by this pathogen. In this study, we examined the morphological and apoptotic effects of this toxin on HT29 cells, using light and electron microscopy in situ, as well as agarose gel electrophoresis of cell DNA. Cells treated with the cytotoxic enterotoxin became round and lost their polarity as well as their adhesion to each other and to the substrate. Cytoplasmic blebbing and nuclear condensation also occurred. DNA fragmentation was detected by TUNEL labelling and agarose gel electrophoresis. These results show that the cytotoxic enterotoxin of A. hydrophila can induce apoptosis in human intestinal cells in culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicAquaculture disease management and microbiotaFrench-language works237,207