Intraepidermal Merkel Cell Carcinoma With No Dermal Involvement
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cutaneous Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) typically involves the dermis. Less than 10% of MCC have epidermal involvement. Only one MCC confined exclusively to the epidermis has been previously reported but was not recognized until the lesion recurred with typical MCC in the dermis. We present a case of a wholly intraepidermal pagetoid MCC without dermal involvement in a 74-year-old man with a 2.0-cm solitary verrucous papule on the left index finger. The initial biopsy and complete excision specimens showed marked epidermal hyperplasia, focal prominent squamous cell atypia, and MCC with florid pagetoid spread through the epidermis. There was no evidence of tumor within the dermis. The pagetoid MCC tumor cells showed diffuse cytoplasmic staining with antibodies to cytokeratin 20, and negative staining for chromogranin, neurofilament, S-100, vimentin, HMB45, leukocyte common antigen, and CD3. The cell of origin of MCC is still debated. The existence of an entirely intraepidermal variant of MCC would lend support to the view that MCC is a neoplastic expression of Merkel cells in at least some cases. Dermal-based MCC is a high-grade primary cutaneous neoplasm, but MCC confined exclusively to the epidermis may have a better prognosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it