Intraepidermal Merkel Cell Carcinoma With No Dermal Involvement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cutaneous Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) typically involves the dermis. Less than 10% of MCC have epidermal involvement. Only one MCC confined exclusively to the epidermis has been previously reported but was not recognized until the lesion recurred with typical MCC in the dermis. We present a case of a wholly intraepidermal pagetoid MCC without dermal involvement in a 74-year-old man with a 2.0-cm solitary verrucous papule on the left index finger. The initial biopsy and complete excision specimens showed marked epidermal hyperplasia, focal prominent squamous cell atypia, and MCC with florid pagetoid spread through the epidermis. There was no evidence of tumor within the dermis. The pagetoid MCC tumor cells showed diffuse cytoplasmic staining with antibodies to cytokeratin 20, and negative staining for chromogranin, neurofilament, S-100, vimentin, HMB45, leukocyte common antigen, and CD3. The cell of origin of MCC is still debated. The existence of an entirely intraepidermal variant of MCC would lend support to the view that MCC is a neoplastic expression of Merkel cells in at least some cases. Dermal-based MCC is a high-grade primary cutaneous neoplasm, but MCC confined exclusively to the epidermis may have a better prognosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".