Catalytic Gasification of Biomass in a CREC Fluidized Riser Simulator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gasification of biomass is an environmentally important technology that may contribute to fulfill requirements set by the Kyoto protocol. Biomass can be converted into a vast array of chemical products and fuel, and can be utilized to produce power/electricity. However, a major limitation of biomass gasification is the resultant tars and particulate matter that potentially destroy downstream process equipment, harm the environment, and hinder economic efficiency. This study considers the catalytic steam gasification of waste-wood, with the catalyst being fluidizable nickel/a-alumina. Experiments are conducted in the CREC Riser Simulator Reactor, at temperatures between 800°C - 850°C, near atmospheric pressures, and reaction times over 10 seconds. Experimental results suggest that catalytic steam gasification of biomass is a versatile process; with a considerable amount of H2 being produced at steam/biomass feed ratios above 0.3kg/kg daf. It is also found that the catalyst effectively converts tars to permanent gases at temperatures ranging from 800°C - 850°C and for steam/biomass feed ratio ranging from 0.17 0.58kg/kg daf, with the carbon conversion being above 90% in all cases. An equilibrium model from the literature is developed and modified, and then considered to analyze the experimental data. At 800°C and steam/biomass ratios from 0.17 0.42kg/kg daf, the H2/CO product ratio is estimated accurately by the equilibrium model. However, product lump compositions are estimated with less accuracy, which provides support to the need of a non-equilibrium model to fully explain the inter-conversion of gaseous species following biomass catalytic gasification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".