Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, nous utilisons le concept de chronotope développé par Bakhtine pour saisir différents modes d’expression de l’espace urbain dans le polar. L’objectif est de montrer qu’une lecture chronotopique, mettant en lumière la superposition et le dialogue des chronotopes au sein d’un même polar, ouvre une perspective nouvelle pour y interpréter la représentation de la ville. La trace de l’escargot, polar récent de Benoît Bouthillette (2005) dont l’action se déroule à Montréal, nous sert d’exemple pour illustrer la pertinence d’une telle lecture. Nous y identifions trois chronotopes : le chronotope classique qui correspond à l’espace-temps, presque cliché, de l’enquête, et les chronotopes réticulaire et historique qui remodèlent le premier. Le rapport dialogique des chronotopes exploite une large palette de la spatialité urbaine et produit une image de la ville en prise à la fois avec les traces du passé montréalais et avec ce que la ville a de tout à fait contemporain et de branché sur le monde.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".