MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007839778 · doi:10.1086/316833

The Low-Resolution DRAO Survey of H [CSC]i[/CSC] Emission from the Galactic Plane

2000· article· en· W2007839778 on OpenAlexaff
L. A. Higgs, K. F. Tapping

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsGalactic planeAstrophysicsSpectral lineTelescopeLongitudeTable (database)LatitudeAstronomyObservatoryEmission spectrumSpectral resolutionGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A survey of H I line emission in the Galactic plane from Galactic longitude l = 72 2 to 149 0, and latitude b = -5 4 to 7 2, has been made using the 26-m Telescope at the Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory. Spectra were observed at 0 2 intervals of longitude and latitude, providing a survey which is fully sampled in the spatial domain. A detailed study of the antenna characteristics of the telescope allowed the correction of the spectra for stray radiation. The spectral resolution is 1.32 km s -1 , and the LSR velocity range is -260 to 161 km s -1 . The final spectra have an estimated T b scaling accuracy of 1% and an estimated rms noise in one channel (0.8245 km s -1 ) of 0.25 K. A region of suspected strong H I self-absorption at l ∼ 92°, b ∼ 3°, has been identified. Comparison with spectra from the Leiden/Dwingeloo Survey is used to estimate the overall accuracy of the stray radiation corrections. This comparison also shows that a small percentage (∼1%) of the spectra in the latter survey suffer from calibration errors exceeding 10%. A table of positions of the more discordant spectra is given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207