MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007861352 · doi:10.1142/s0219519402000447

HISTORY DEPENDENCE OF SKELETAL MUSCLE FORCE PRODUCTION: A FORGOTTEN PROPERTY

2002· article· en· W2007861352 on OpenAlexaff
Walter Herzog, Dilson E. Rassier

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSarcomereIsometric exerciseMuscle contractionSkeletal muscleContraction (grammar)AnatomyMaterials scienceMyocyteBiologyMedicinePhysiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Steady-state force enhancement following active muscle stretching has been observed for well over fifty years, and is a widely accepted property of skeletal muscle contraction. Force enhancement has typically been associated with instability of sarcomere length on the descending limb of the force-length relationship. Here, we demonstrate that the sarcomere length non-uniformity paradigm, based on instability, cannot explain much of the newly discovered results. We provide evidence that force enhancement can occur on the stable ascending limb of the force-length relationship, that force enhancement can exceed the isometric tetanic plateau forces, that it is associated with an increased passive force, and that it occurs for perfectly stable sarcomere lengths on the descending limb of the force-length relationship. Combining all the results, we conclude that force enhancement has at least two components, an active and a passive component, that contribute towards the total force enhancement to varying degrees, depending on the contractile history of muscle contraction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.765
Threshold uncertainty score0.197

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mechanics in Medicine and BiologySame topicCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesFrench-language works237,207