MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007869436 · doi:10.1353/tjt.2012.0024

More Than Matter? Is There More to Life Than Molecules? (review)

2012· article· en· W2007869436 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Donald Wiebe

Bibliographic record

VenueToronto Journal of Theology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicHistory and advancements in chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: More Than Matter? Is There More to Life Than Molecules? Donald Wiebe Keith Ward. More Than Matter? Is There More to Life Than Molecules? Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2010. Pp. 223. Paper, US$20.00. ISBN 9780802866608. More than Matter? is essentially a book about the nature of human persons (207) but is not as focused in its attention as that theme might suggest. The book is written by a humanist (7), from a philosophical point of view and in light of the presiding assumption that “human persons are not accidental mistakes in a pointless perambulation of fundamental particles” and “[who] are [therefore] a window into the inner reality, value, and purpose of the cosmos” (8). This allows Ward to touch upon a wide range of related philosophical issues and humanist concerns, although it also seems to preclude an openness of mind. Nevertheless, the essential point Ward wishes to get across to the reader is that “there is no more important question in the whole of philosophy and in the whole of life than that of what a person really is” (63). Although Ward claims not to reject scientific discoveries about the character of human nature and existence, his project here is not a neutral account of persons; he is convinced that humans cannot be accounted for simply in terms of “molecules in motion.” Rather, he writes, human persons are “continuing centres of consciousness and responsible moral agency” (63), and what is needed in being able to account for them as such, he maintains, is providing what he calls “ontological backing” that permits a clear distinction between their agency and inanimate matter. Thus he proposes in this volume, as he puts it, a “philosophical idealism as the most adequate, consistent, and plausible metaphysical view of reality [since it] carries with it a theory of human persons as experientially unique, morally free, and fully embodied subjects of experience and action, living in an interpersonal world of similar beings—a community of social and self-realizing conscious agents” (182). Aspects of this view find some elaboration in chapter 5 in an argument for the priority of the mental over the physical in opposition to the views of his teacher Gilbert Ryle, and in chapter 6 where he insists that despite the argument for the priority of mind over matter, human minds do not inhabit a separate mental universe. These points are important for his later argument in support of “dual-aspect idealism” developed in chapter 7 in which he shows not only the possibility of the existence of minds independent of matter but also that matter is not simply an illusion but has its own kind of reality, despite ultimately being dependent upon mind (102). Support for such a philosophical idealism, claims Ward, requires rational clarity “about what is really real” (21), and in the first four chapters of the book he reviews eight different philosophical systems on what the ultimate building blocks of the universe are. Not surprisingly, he concludes that long discussion with the suggestion that idealism provides the soundest account of what’s really real and then proceeds to a critique of the reductive materialism that denies a radical distinction between mind and matter. Having had Gilbert Ryle as a teacher in his Oxford days, Ward sees his task in this regard as requiring a dismantling of Ryle’s critique of Descartes in his The Concept of Mind (1949). This he does in chapter 8 and supports his conclusions in chapters 9 and 10 by way of critical assessments of recent scientific views of the relationship of between mind and brain, in which he argues that minds are more than just functional properties of brains and bodies (116) and cannot be explained simply in terms of physical laws (145). In chapters 12 and 13 Ward further explores “what it is about the inner lives of human persons that gives them unique moral value” (155), and in chapter 14 elaborates on the philosophical and scientific implications of “the idealist view of life.” In his concluding chapter, Ward argues that even though his whole project here is a philosophical one, it would be foolish to overlook the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueToronto Journal of TheologySame topicHistory and advancements in chemistryFrench-language works237,207