MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007920791 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m109.055764

Mechanism of Action of an Imidopiperidine Inhibitor of Human Polynucleotide Kinase/Phosphatase

2009· article· en· W2007920791 on OpenAlexafffund
Gary K. Freschauf, Rajam S. Mani, Todd R. Mereniuk, Mesfin Fanta, Caesar A. Virgen, Grigory L. Dianov, Jean‐Marie Grassot, Dennis G. Hall, Michael Weinfeld

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer therapeutics and mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Cancer Foundation
KeywordsPhosphataseMechanism of actionPolynucleotideBiochemistryChemistryMechanism (biology)Action (physics)KinaseEnzymeIn vitroPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The small molecule, 2-(1-hydroxyundecyl)-1-(4-nitrophenylamino)-6-phenyl-6,7a-dihydro-1H-pyrrolo[3,4-b]pyridine-5,7(2H,4aH)-dione (A12B4C3), is a potent inhibitor of the phosphatase activity of human polynucleotide kinase/phosphatase (PNKP) in vitro. Kinetic analysis revealed that A12B4C3 acts as a noncompetitive inhibitor, and this was confirmed by fluorescence quenching, which showed that the inhibitor can form a ternary complex with PNKP and a DNA substrate, i.e. A12B4C3 does not prevent DNA from binding to the phosphatase DNA binding site. Conformational analysis using circular dichroism, UV difference spectroscopy, and fluorescence resonance energy transfer all indicate that A12B4C3 disrupts the secondary structure of PNKP. Investigation of the potential site of binding of A12B4C3 to PNKP using site-directed mutagenesis pointed to interaction between Trp402 of PNKP and the inhibitor. Cellular studies revealed that A12B4C3 sensitizes A549 human lung cancer cells to the topoisomerase I poison, camptothecin, but not the topoisomerase II poison, etoposide, in a manner similar to small interfering RNA against PNKP. A12B4C3 also inhibits the repair of DNA single and double strand breaks following exposure of cells to ionizing radiation, but does not inhibit two other key strand-break repair enzymes, DNA polymerase β or DNA ligase III, providing additional evidence that PNKP is the cellular target of the inhibitor. The small molecule, 2-(1-hydroxyundecyl)-1-(4-nitrophenylamino)-6-phenyl-6,7a-dihydro-1H-pyrrolo[3,4-b]pyridine-5,7(2H,4aH)-dione (A12B4C3), is a potent inhibitor of the phosphatase activity of human polynucleotide kinase/phosphatase (PNKP) in vitro. Kinetic analysis revealed that A12B4C3 acts as a noncompetitive inhibitor, and this was confirmed by fluorescence quenching, which showed that the inhibitor can form a ternary complex with PNKP and a DNA substrate, i.e. A12B4C3 does not prevent DNA from binding to the phosphatase DNA binding site. Conformational analysis using circular dichroism, UV difference spectroscopy, and fluorescence resonance energy transfer all indicate that A12B4C3 disrupts the secondary structure of PNKP. Investigation of the potential site of binding of A12B4C3 to PNKP using site-directed mutagenesis pointed to interaction between Trp402 of PNKP and the inhibitor. Cellular studies revealed that A12B4C3 sensitizes A549 human lung cancer cells to the topoisomerase I poison, camptothecin, but not the topoisomerase II poison, etoposide, in a manner similar to small interfering RNA against PNKP. A12B4C3 also inhibits the repair of DNA single and double strand breaks following exposure of cells to ionizing radiation, but does not inhibit two other key strand-break repair enzymes, DNA polymerase β or DNA ligase III, providing additional evidence that PNKP is the cellular target of the inhibitor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicCancer therapeutics and mechanismsFrench-language works237,207