Level of ventilation influences the cardiovascular response to hypoxemia in lambs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Newborn animals of a number of species display a brisk increase in ventilation followed by a gradual drop toward or below baseline within minutes of exposure to acute hypoxemia. Heart rate and cardiac output (a determinant of systemic oxygen transport along with the arterial oxygen content) appear to follow a similar pattern, but whether or not the cardiovascular response is influenced by the respiratory response is unknown. We therefore carried out experiments in which the level of ventilation was controlled during normoxemia and hypoxemia to test the hypothesis that the level of ventilation influences the cardiovascular response to acute hypoxemia. Six lambs ranging in age from 17 to 22 days were anesthetized, tracheostomized, and instrumented for measurement of cardiovascular variables. A recovery period of at least 3 days was allowed before the study when each lamb was artificially ventilated with a mixture of 70% nitrous oxide and 30% oxygen in nitrogen. A control respiratory frequency (f) of 30 breaths per min was set and a control tidal volume (VT) was chosen to achieve normocapnia. Cardiovascular measurements were made during normoxemia and hypoxemia (FIO2 0.10) 5 min after f or VT was changed to simulate a decrease, no change, or an increase in ventilation. During normoxemia, the level of ventilation had little effect on the measured cardiovascular variables. At control levels of ventilation, hypoxemia caused an increase in cardiac output that was due solely to an increase in stroke volume as heart rate decreased; blood pressure was unchanged. Increasing ventilation during hypoxemia did not augment cardiac output or alter blood pressure as compared with that observed at control levels of ventilation. Decreasing ventilation during hypoxemia, however, decreased cardiac output due to a profound bradycardia; blood pressure increased significantly. Our data provide evidence that the level of ventilation significantly influences the cardiovascular response to hypoxemia in young lambs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".