MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007948494 · doi:10.5539/jas.v4n12p13

Relationship between Bagworm Pteroma Pendula Joannis (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) Populations, Parasitoids, and Weather Parameters in Oil Palm Plantation

2012· article· en· W2007948494 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nor Ahya Mahadi, Rita Muhamad, Nur Azura Adam

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicOil Palm Production and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversiti Putra Malaysia
KeywordsIchneumonidaeParasitoidBiologyHymenopteraLepidoptera genitaliaParasitismBiological pest controlBotanyEcologyHost (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A study on interactions between bagworm Pteroma pendula Joannis (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) populations with parasitoids and weather conditions was carried out at a smallholder oil palm plantation in Hutan Melintang, Perak, Malaysia from January 2011 until December 2011. Samplaing was performed monthly and parasitoids emergence were observed daily. The findings showed that eleven parasitoid species were identified parasitizing the bagworms. The top three parasitoids were Goryphus bunoh (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), Eupelmus catoxanthae (Hymenoptera: Eupelmidae), and Eurytoma sp. (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae). Bagworms and parasitoids populations were not correlated with weather parameters. The parasitoid populations in this study were relatively low. However, parasitoids were dependent on the bagworms and their populations could have be adversely affected by other factors. The parasitism potential in controlling bagworms need to be investigated further in order to establish their use as biocontrol agents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicOil Palm Production and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207