Synthesis and Optimization of a New Family of Type 3 17β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Inhibitors by Parallel Liquid-Phase Chemistry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Type 3 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (17 beta-HSD) transforms 4-androstene-3,17-dione (Delta(4)-dione) into the androgen testosterone. To produce potent inhibitors of this key steroidogenic enzyme, we performed parallel liquid-phase synthesis of 3beta-substituted androsterone (ADT) libraries (A-D) in good yields and average high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) purities of 92-94%. The first library (A) of 3 beta-amidomethyl-ADT derivatives (168 members), including two levels of molecular diversity on the amide (R(1) and R(2)), was synthesized with a parallel liquid-phase method (method I) in less time than with the classic chemistry method. The screening of library A revealed that relatively small hydrophobic chains at R(1) (5-8 carbons) and small hydrophobic substituents at R(2) (1-4 carbons) provided the most potent inhibitors. In accordance with these inhibition results, a second library (B) of 3 beta-amidomethyl-ADT derivatives (56 members) was generated in a very short time using an improved method based on scavenger resins and liquid-phase parallel chemistry. Library B produced more potent inhibitors than library A and provided useful structure-activity relationships that directed the design of a third library (C) of 49 members. Once again, very potent inhibitors were identified from library C and 3 beta-[(N-adamantylmethyl-N-butanoyl)aminomethyl]-3 alpha-hydroxy-5 alpha-androstan-17-one (C-7-3) was identified as the most potent inhibitor of the three libraries with an inhibitory activity (IC(50) = 35 nM) 18-fold higher than that of the natural substrate of the enzyme, Delta(4)-dione, (IC(50) = 650 nM) used itself as inhibitor. Finally, we designed a library (D) of 3-carbamate-ADT derivatives (25 members) using the efficient parallel liquid-phase method III, which allowed the synthesis of more rigid molecules with two levels of molecular diversity (R(1)/R(2) and R(3)) in the local area occupied by the adamantane group of C-7-3. Interestingly, one of the most potent inhibitors of library D, the 3R-spiro-[3'-[3' '-N-morpholino-2' '-(3' "-cyclopentyl-propionyloxy)propyl]-2'-oxo-oxazolidin-5'-yl]-5 alpha-androstan-17-one (D-5-4), showed an inhibitory activity on type 3 17 beta-HSD similar to that of compound C-7-3, while exhibiting a nonandrogenic profile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".