MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008013623 · doi:10.1353/ecf.2006.0029

Righteous Letters: Vindications of Two Refugees in Lettres d'une Peruvienne and Its Unauthorized Sequel, Lettres taitiennes

2005· article· en· W2008013623 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEuropean Political History Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeePoliticsDiplomacyHumanitiesInternational lawLawPolitical scienceInternational communitySociologyArt historyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Righteous Letters:Vindications of Two Refugees in Lettres dune Péruvienne and Its Unauthorized Sequel, Lettres taïtiennes Giulia Pacini (bio) Some of the most heated discussions in the eighteenth century revolved around the issue of human rights and the fundamentals of international law.1 Throughout this period, jurists and philosophers applied themselves to the study of the law of nations and the rules of diplomacy. Repeatedly they pointed to the value of establishing an active international community, debating the extent of the political role of this community, as well as the laws that should ideally regulate international relations. They mainly attempted to theorize what Castel de Saint-Pierre, in 1712, called a "system of peace," that is, a political system capable of ensuring peace and happiness throughout Europe. Only on occasion did someone bring up the idea that the international community might have duties towards individuals who lost their homes as the result of civil or foreign wars.2 In 1758, for example, Emmerich [End Page 169] de Vattel argued that granting refuge meant more than simply granting a person entry within a country's borders: "le Souverain ne peut accorder l'entrée de ses États pour faire tomber les étrangers dans un piège. Dès qu'il les reçoit, il s'engage à les protéger comme ses propres sujets, à les faire jouir, autant qu'il dépend de lui, d'une entière sûreté."3 As he described the humanitarian objectives of national and international laws, Vattel took care to underline the ongoing nature of a country's responsibilities towards the people it agreed to host. This was a groundbreaking concept, both because of the ideals it represented, and because, at the time, European governments had not yet developed national or international policies with which to address the situation of refugees. Until the end of the eighteenth century, nations tended to respond to the arrival of foreign exiles—such as French Huguenots, Spanish Jews, English Jacobites, and Dutch Patriots—on the basis of self-serving and ad hoc political or economic calculations.4 Given the rarity of any discussion in the eighteenth century about the situation of refugees, it is striking to note that this exact problem figures at the centre of a novel by a woman writer from Lorraine. In Lettres d'une Péruvienne, an immensely successful epistolary novel first published in 1747 and then re-edited in 1752, Françoise de Graffigny displayed a distinctive interest in addressing the psychological, socio-political, economic, and legal ramifications of war, imprisonment, and exile.5 Like Vattel, she emphasized how prisoners of war and refugees have long-term needs that their hosting community must address. By setting her novel in an explicitly colonial context, moreover, Graffigny sharpened the focus of discussion to highlight the unbalanced power [End Page 170] structures that configured colonial relationships, ultimately bringing up the question of European responsibility towards the inhabitants of its overseas colonies. As she depicted the plight of a Peruvian woman victimized by European expansionist enterprise, Graffigny insisted that human beings maintain their fundamental rights even after they have fallen into captivity. Far from assuming that they should simply be grateful for their lives, she suggested that prisoners of war are entitled to exceptional forms of protection and social support. Last but not least, as she raised the crucial question of what happens when a refugee is forced to resettle on foreign soil, Graffigny intimated to her readership that the effects of European colonialism would soon become visible at home, in France, as well as overseas. The novel relates the adventures of an Incan princess made prisoner during the conquest of Peru. Initially captured by the Spanish, Zilia changes hands when the French attack the Spanish boats: in accordance with the "droit de la guerre," the Peruvian woman is given to the victorious French commander, the chevalier de Déterville, who, in the name of the King of France, seems authorized to keep and then to free the prisoner he has taken.6 Following orders by Déterville, Zilia thus embarks on a journey that inexplicably transports her, over time and across space, from sixteenth-century Peru...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it