Effect of Hyperbranched Poly(butyl methacrylate) on Polymer Diffusion in Poly(butyl acrylate-<i>co</i>-methyl methacrylate) Latex Films
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Latex paint formulations normally contain volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to lower the modulus of the latex polymer and to enhance the rate of its diffusion in latex films. Here we show that hyperbranched poly(butyl methacrylate) (HB-PBMA) not only is miscible with poly(butyl acrylate- co -methyl methacrylate) [P(BA-MMA)] copolymers over a range of BA/MMA compositions but also acts as a diffusion promoter. At similar volume fractions (≤0.1), it is as effective at promoting P(BA-MMA) polymer diffusion as 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol monoisobutyrate (Texanol, TPM), a classic coalescing aid. Unlike TPM, it does not cause a large decrease in the glass transition temperature of the polymer, and it has relatively little effect on the modulus of the polymer. Small molecule additives commonly lead to a reduction of useful mechanical properties of a polymer, such as tensile strength and toughness. Tensile tests show that P(BA-MMA) latex films containing HB-PBMA have better mechanical properties than the corresponding films containing TPM. Thus, this hyperbranched polymer represents a new kind of nonvolatile additive for latex that can promote the rate of polymer diffusion in latex films without significantly disrupting the desirable mechanical properties of the film.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it