Development, Testing, and Field Deployment of a Hydraulically Expanded Solid Liner Hanger in a Casing Directionally Drilled Well in Norway
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract When ConocoPhillips (COP) decided to conduct Casing Directional Drilling (CDD) operations from a platform in the Norwegian Sector of the North Sea, the well design required that the drilled in 7-3/4" production casing string be converted into a liner prior to completing the well. There was a challenge in identifying a liner hanger system that would be suitable for CDD operations; that did not require a running tool; would maintain a full internal diameter (ID) for running and retrieving bottom hole assemblies (BHA's) and would act as a barrier against gas migration over the service life of the well. Expandable technology(1) was identified as a potential solution. Once a service provider was identified, a basis of design was established and testing began. The end result after eighteen (18) months of work was a successful field deployment of a 7-3/4" liner hanger that was drilled in from surface; successfully expanded into 10-3/4" casing; had a load capability of over 440,000 lbs (200 metric tons or MT) and a 5,000 psi (345 bar) gas tight seal qualified to ISO 14310:V0. This paper will describe the development, testing and actual deployment that took place between December 2006 and January 2007.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".