Prioritization of orphan disease-causing genes using topological feature and GO similarity between proteins in interaction networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Identification of disease-causing genes among a large number of candidates is a fundamental challenge in human disease studies. However, it is still time-consuming and laborious to determine the real disease-causing genes by biological experiments. With the advances of the high-throughput techniques, a large number of protein-protein interactions have been produced. Therefore, to address this issue, several methods based on protein interaction network have been proposed. In this paper, we propose a shortest path-based algorithm, named SPranker, to prioritize disease-causing genes in protein interaction networks. Considering the fact that diseases with similar phenotypes are generally caused by functionally related genes, we further propose an improved algorithm SPGOranker by integrating the semantic similarity of GO annotations. SPGOranker not only considers the topological similarity between protein pairs in a protein interaction network but also takes their functional similarity into account. The proposed algorithms SPranker and SPGOranker were applied to 1598 known orphan disease-causing genes from 172 orphan diseases and compared with three state-of-the-art approaches, ICN, VS and RWR. The experimental results show that SPranker and SPGOranker outperform ICN, VS, and RWR for the prioritization of orphan disease-causing genes. Importantly, for the case study of severe combined immunodeficiency, SPranker and SPGOranker predict several novel causal genes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it