Prioritization of orphan disease-causing genes using topological feature and GO similarity between proteins in interaction networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Identification of disease-causing genes among a large number of candidates is a fundamental challenge in human disease studies. However, it is still time-consuming and laborious to determine the real disease-causing genes by biological experiments. With the advances of the high-throughput techniques, a large number of protein-protein interactions have been produced. Therefore, to address this issue, several methods based on protein interaction network have been proposed. In this paper, we propose a shortest path-based algorithm, named SPranker, to prioritize disease-causing genes in protein interaction networks. Considering the fact that diseases with similar phenotypes are generally caused by functionally related genes, we further propose an improved algorithm SPGOranker by integrating the semantic similarity of GO annotations. SPGOranker not only considers the topological similarity between protein pairs in a protein interaction network but also takes their functional similarity into account. The proposed algorithms SPranker and SPGOranker were applied to 1598 known orphan disease-causing genes from 172 orphan diseases and compared with three state-of-the-art approaches, ICN, VS and RWR. The experimental results show that SPranker and SPGOranker outperform ICN, VS, and RWR for the prioritization of orphan disease-causing genes. Importantly, for the case study of severe combined immunodeficiency, SPranker and SPGOranker predict several novel causal genes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".