Características espermáticas de sêmen resfriado de suíno e conservado em diferentes diluentes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Utilizaram-se 36 ejaculados de três cachaços, diluídos em partes iguais, com os diluentes Beltsville Thawing Solution (BTS), Zorlesco-modificado (ZOR) e BTZOR (desenvolvido na Universidade Estadual de Maringá), para avaliar as características do sêmen e o período de conservação até 25% de motilidade progressiva (MP) para cada diluente. O modelo estatístico foi de blocos inteiramente casualizados, bloqueando cachaço/mês. O período de conservação foi maior no BTZOR (4,94±0,30 dias), seguido pelos ZOR (4,62±0,29 dias) e BTS (3,27±0,30 dias). Análises de regressão mostraram comportamento quadrático na MP para os meios BTS e ZOR e cúbico para o BTZOR, com o decorrer dos dias de conservação. O vigor (V) apresentou comportamento linear para BTS e ZOR e quadrático para BTZOR. O grau de aglutinação apresentou comportamento linear para todos os diluentes. O BTZOR conservou sêmen por maior período de tempo, mantendo melhores médias de motilidade progressiva e vigor, seguido pelos ZOR e BTS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".