Comorbilidad entre distrés psicológico y abuso de drogas en pacientes de centros de tratamiento: implicaciones en políticas y programas, Managua - Nicaragua
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la prevalencia de la comorbilidad entre el distress psicológico y el abuso/dependencia de drogas en los pacientes de los centros de tratamiento de Nicaragua. Se aplicaron cuestionarios EULAC-CICAD en forma de entrevista para describir el perfil del paciente y Kessler 10 para estimar niveles del distress a 130 usuarios de tres Centros de las Organizaciones no Gubernamentales de Managua, Nicaragua. Nivel encontrado de distress psicológico (severo y muy severo), fue de un 35%. También se encontró que un número importante de los pacientes que están siendo tratados actualmente por problemas de salud mental, persisten en experimentar síntomas del distress psicológico. Se concluyó que los hallazgos de este estudio sugieren una revisión sistemática de las políticas y estrategias de intervención y el fortalecimiento de ambos sistemas involucrados, Sistema de Salud y de Drogodependencia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".