MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008166700 · doi:10.2298/abs1201183v

Tropic responses of potato single-node explant cultures

2012· article· en· W2008166700 on OpenAlexaff
D. Vinterhalter, Branka Vinterhalter

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Biological Sciences · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant tissue culture and regeneration
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Biological Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDarknessExplant cultureCurvatureApex (geometry)HorticultureBendingBotanyIrradiationChemistryPhysicsMaterials scienceBiologyMathematicsIn vitroComposite materialGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A special in-vitro protocol was elaborated enabling the production of potato single-node explant plantlets that can be used as objects for tropic studies. In light-grown plantlets, achievement of a full (90?) phototropic (PT) curvature required 75 to 120 min of continuous unilateral blue light irradiation or 120-135 min of gravitropic stimulation (GT). Time-lapse photography revealed that the curves describing PT and GT bending have a sigmoid shape. Continuous BL irradiation was necessary for the induction of continuous PT bending. If the BL was turned off after 30-50 min of PT stimulation, the bending gradually decreased and stopped in darkness after 25.0 ? 2.0 min. Within this period, curvature increased by 15.5 ? 1.5?. When the BL was turned off upon completion of PT bending (when the plantlets reached an angle of 90?), the plantlets entered the phase of fast straightening. The 90? PT curvature was significantly exaggerated in darkness by turning the jars from a vertical to horizontal position providing 120.74 ? 2.5? as the final curvature angle after two more hours in darkness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Biological SciencesSame topicPlant tissue culture and regenerationFrench-language works237,207