Synthesis and Antiviral Activity of Novel 5-(1-Cyanamido-2-haloethyl) and 5-(1-Hydroxy(or methoxy)-2-azidoethyl) Analogues of Uracil Nucleosides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new class of 5-(1-cyanamido-2-haloethyl)-2'-deoxyuridines (4-6) and arabinouridines (7, 8) were synthesized by the regiospecific addition of halogenocyanamides (X-NHCN) to the 5-vinyl substituent of the respective 5-vinyl-2'-deoxyuridine (2) and 2'-arabinouridine (3). Reaction of 2 with sodium azide, ceric ammonium nitrate, and acetonitrile-methanol or water afforded the 5-(1-hydroxy-2-azidoethyl)-(10) and 5-(1-methoxy-2-azidoethyl)-2'-deoxyuridines (11). In vitro antiviral activities against HSV-1-TK(+) (KOS and E-377), HSV-1-TK(-), HSV-2, VZV, HCMV, and DHBV were determined. Of the newly synthesized compounds, 5-(1-cyanamido-2-iodoethyl)-2'-deoxyuridine (6) exhibited the most potent anti-HSV-1 activity, which was equipotent to acyclovir and superior to 5-ethyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EDU). In addition, it was significantly inhibitory for thymidine kinase deficient strain of HSV-1 (EC(50) = 2.3-15.3 microM). The 5-(1-cyanamido-2-haloethyl)-2'-deoxyuridines (4-6) all were approximately equipotent against HSV-2 and were approximately 1.5- and 15-fold less inhibitory for HSV-2 than EDU and acyclovir, respectively. Compounds 4-6 were all inactive against HCMV but exhibited appreciable antiviral activity against VZV. Their anti-VZV activity was similar or higher to that of EDU and approximately 5-12-fold lower than that of acyclovir. The 5-(1-cyanamido-2-haloethyl)-(7,8) analogues of arabinouridine were moderately inhibitory for VZV and HSV-1 (strain KOS), whereas compounds 10 and 11 were inactive against herpes viruses. Compounds 5 and 6 also demonstrated modest anti-hepatitis B virus activity against DHBV (EC(50) = 19.9-23.6 microM). Interestingly, the related 5-(1-azido-2-bromoethyl)-2'-deoxyuridine (1n) analogue proved to be markedly inhibitory to DHBV replication (EC(50) = 2.6-6.6 microM). All compounds investigated exhibited low host cell toxicity to several stationary and proliferating host cell lines as well as mitogen-stimulated proliferating human T lymphocytes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".