MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008198190 · doi:10.1051/jp4:2001837

Effect of hot-rolling in the austenitic region on the formation of isothermal bainite in a 0.4C-1.5Si-1.4Mn steel

2001· article· en· W2008198190 on OpenAlexafffund
E. Girault, Stéphane Godet, Pascal Jacques, Ph. Bocher, Bert Verlinden, J. Van Humbeeck

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal de Physique IV (Proceedings) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrostructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersServices Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et CulturellesFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekMcGill University
KeywordsBainiteAusteniteMaterials scienceMetallurgyFerrite (magnet)Isothermal processMicrostructureDislocationDeformation (meteorology)AlloyComposite materialThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper aims to give further insights on the changes that are brought on bainite formation by prior hot-deformation. To this end, a thermomechanical treatment was performed on blocks of a 0.4C-1.5Si-1.4Mn steel. The chemistry of this alloy allowed hot-rolling in the full austenitic range up to large reductions without any significant recrystallisation. The deformed plates were then partially transformed to bainite and the resulting microstmctures were subjected to investigation. The laths of bainitic ferrite appeared to be grouped in packets in which they exhibit the same crystallographic orientation. When no prior hot-deformation is applied, the bainite packets originating from the same austenite parent grain were randomly distributed. However, severely deformed austenite grains were found to give rise to typical orientations of the bainitic ferrite laths. These results were interpreted in terms of dislocation arrays interacting with a displacive transformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal de Physique IV (Proceedings)Same topicMicrostructure and Mechanical Properties of SteelsFrench-language works237,207