MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2008198257 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-4839

Abstract 4839: SNP-SNP interactions in mitochondria-related pathways are associated with invasive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC) risk .

2013· article· en· W2008198257 on OpenAlexaff
Hui‐Yi Lin, Ya-Yu Tsai, Y. Ann Chen, Zhihua Chen, Xiaotao Qu, Ellen L. Goode, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Edwin S. Iversen, Steven A. Narod, Thomas A. Sellers, Catherine M. Phelan

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsWomen's College Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSNPBiologySingle-nucleotide polymorphismLinkage disequilibriumGeneticsMitochondrionGenotypeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Variation in mitochondrial genes in cancer cells alters the mitochondrial bioenergetic and biosynthetic state, which mediates cross-talk between mitochondria and the nucleus to modulate many cellular processes. The objective of this study was to comprehensively evaluate mitochondria-nuclear cross-talk in terms of SNP-SNP interactions associated with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk, which may play an important role in unveiling the underlying mechanism of this complex lethal disease. Methods: Our analyses were based on 1,938 invasive EOC cases and 2,009 controls with greater than 80% European ancestry from five case-control studies genotyped using the Illumina 610quad chip. We evaluated 2,488 SNPs in over 1,500 genes in eight mitochondria-related pathways (apoptosis, oxidation-reduction, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, immunomoduation, transmembrane transport, small GTPases, BRCA1-interactors and circadian rhythm). SNPs with strong linkage disequilibrium of r2 > 0.8 were excluded. We examined 2-way SNP-SNP interactions associated with invasive EOC risk using the two-stage Random Forests plus Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (TRM) approach. Bootstrapping was further performed to select important variables and reduce false positive findings. Based on the scree plot using 1,000 bootstrap samples, the factors with more than 4% of bootstrap frequency were defined as significant factors. We then included each identified factors separately in model adjusting for study site and first principal component representing European ancestry. Results: Five significant SNP-SNP interactions were observed: (rs2270799 in IQSEC3 (12p13.33) + rs933305 in CUX2 (12q24.3), (p= 6.3x10−5); rs6063251 in PREX1 (20q13.3) + rs9705 in SLC39A8 (4q22-q24), (p= 3.5x10−5); rs933305 in CUX2 (12q24.3) + rs1712957 in ARHGAP15 (2q22.2-q22.3), (p=4.2x10−7), rs2861828 in SLIT1 (10q23.3-q24) + rs6063251 in PREX1 (20q13.3), (p=2.5x10−7); rs10954593 in SEMA3C (7q21-q31) + rs933305 in CUX2 (12q24.3), (p=2.8x10−3). Four of the five interactions involved SNPs from genes in the small GTPases pathway (IQSEC3; PREX1 (twice) and ARHGAP15). In addition, three of the five interaction pairs involved the CUX2 gene. This gene encodes a protein which contains three CUT domains and a homeodomain, which are DNA-binding motifs. The main mitochondrial SNP-SNP interaction involved the nuclear mitochondria gene SLC39A8. Conclusions: Our results suggest that genetic variation in mitochondrial-related pathways may be associated with invasive EOC risk. These findings highlight important genes/pathways that may interact as a network to influence invasive EOC risk and may generate novel therapeutic targets. External validation will be done using other independent studies for future analyses. Citation Format: Hui-Yi Lin, Ya-Yu Tsai, Y. Ann Chen, Zhihua Chen, Xiaotao Qu, Ellen L. Goode, Joellen Schildkraut, Edwin Iversen, Steven A. Narod, Thomas A. Sellers, Catherine M. Phelan. SNP-SNP interactions in mitochondria-related pathways are associated with invasive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC) risk . [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4839. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-4839

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research→French-language works237,207→