Aqueous solubility and membrane interactions of hydrophobic peptides with peptoid tags
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lysine tagging of hydrophobic peptides of parent sequence KKAAALAAAAALAAWAALAAAKKKK-NH(2) has been shown to facilitate their synthesis and purification through water solubilization, yet not impact on the intrinsic properties of the hydrophobic core sequence with respect to its insertion into membranes in an alpha-helical conformation. However, due to their positively charged character, such peptides often become bound to phospholipid head groups in membrane surfaces, which inhibits their transbilayer insertion and/or prevents their transport across cellular bilayers. We sought to develop more neutral peptides of membrane-permeable character by replacing most Lys residues with uncharged peptoid [N-(R)glycyl] residues, which might similarly confer water solubility while retaining membrane-interactive properties of the hydrophobic core. Several "peptoid-tagged" derivatives of the parent peptide were prepared with varying peptoid content, with five of the six Lys residues replaced with peptoids Nala and/or Nval. Conformations of these peptides measured by circular dichroism spectroscopy demonstrated that these water-soluble peptides retain the alpha-helix structure in micelles (lysophosphatidylcholine and sodium dodecyl sulfate) notwithstanding the known helix-breaking capacity of the peptoid tags. Blue shifts in Trp fluorescence spectra and quenching experiments with acrylamide confirmed that peptoid-tagged peptides insert spontaneously into micellar membranes. Results suggest that upon introduction of uncharged tags, the interaction between the membrane and the peptides is dominated by the hydrophobicity of the peptide core rather than the electrostatic interactions between the Lys and the head groups of the lipids. The overall findings indicate that peptoid residues are effective surrogates for Lys as uncharged water-solubilizing tags and, as such, provide a potentially valuable feature of design of membrane-interactive peptides.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".