MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008231812 · doi:10.1002/pen.10052

Prediction of water solubility in nylon melts based on flory‐huggins theory

2003· article· en· W2008231812 on OpenAlexaff
Mark A. Schaffer, Kimberley B. McAuley, Michael F. Cunningham, E. Keith Marchildon

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymer Engineering and Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer crystallization and properties
Canadian institutionsDuPont (Canada)Queen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolubilityMaterials scienceThermodynamicsPolyamideFlory–Huggins solution theoryNylon 6Hildebrand solubility parameterPolymerizationNylon 66Polymer chemistryPolymerPhysical chemistryChemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The solubility of water in molten aliphatic polyamides (nylons) of high degrees of polymerization at conditions of subatmospheric water partial pressure and high temperature (225 to 300°C) has been modeled. A simple, semi‐empirical model based on Flory‐Huggins theory was fit to the available literature data for nylons 6, 66, 610 and 11 and to new experimental data for nylon 612. The model contains only two fitted parameters, and is able to adequately describe the available data for the effects of temperature and nylon type on the water concentration in the melt at various water partial pressures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolymer Engineering and ScienceSame topicPolymer crystallization and propertiesFrench-language works237,207