MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008238330 · doi:10.1109/lpt.2012.2202316

Ultrafast All-Optical Wavelet Transform Based on Temporal Pulse Shaping Incorporating a 2-D Array of Cascaded Linearly Chirped Fiber Bragg Gratings

2012· article· en· W2008238330 on OpenAlexaff
Ming Li, Jianping Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Photonics Technology Letters · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUltrashort pulseOpticsFiber Bragg gratingWavelet transformWaveletDiscrete wavelet transformComputer sciencePhysicsMaterials scienceOptical fiberLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An all-optical wavelet transformer used to analyze a high-speed and broadband electrical signal is proposed and demonstrated for the first time to our knowledge. The wavelet transform is implemented based on a temporal pulse shaping system incorporating a 2-D array of cascaded linearly chirped fiber Bragg gratings (LCFBGs). An electrical signal to be analyzed is applied to a Mach-Zehnder modulator to modulate the optical spectrum of a time-stretched optical pulse from a mode-locked laser. Each individual LCFBG in the 2-D array functions as a wavelet filter to filter a specific range of the spectrum, which is equivalent to applying a window function to the corresponding section of the temporal signal, and at the same time, as a dispersive element to perform real-time Fourier transform. A Mexican Hat wavelet is employed to implement the optical wavelet transform, which can be achieved based on a specially designed LCFBG. A theoretical analysis is performed which is verified by a proof-of-concept experiment. The key feature of this technique is that it can perform multiresolution time-frequency analysis of an ultrahigh-speed electrical signal, which can give good time resolution for high-speed signals, and good frequency resolution for low-speed signals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Photonics Technology LettersSame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207