Improper Use of a Transtibial Prosthesis Silicone Liner Causing Pressure Ulceration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present the previously unreported hazard of creating pressure ulceration in a susceptible host by the improper use of a silicone prosthetic liner. An 80-yr-old man sustained a recent transtibial amputation for peripheral vascular disease. His comorbidities included vascular cognitive impairment, type 2 diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, anemia of chronic disease, postherpetic neuralgia, and pruritus of uncertain origin. When not using his transtibial prosthesis, he found his 1.5-mm thick silicone liner (ICEROSS) more comfortable to wear than his stump shrinker and thermoplastic protector. Moreover, he repeatedly wore his liner rolled partway down his stump to allow him to scratch pruritic skin. A horizontal, linear, stage 2 ulcer developed on the residual limb under the upper edge of the rolled liner. The ulcer required >3 mos to heal. This case illustrates the importance of candidate selection for roll-on liners, proper patient and professional training, and optimal management of patient comorbidities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".