Floor vibration control using semi-active tuned mass dampers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper discusses the application of a new class of semi-active tuned mass dampers, called ground-hook tuned mass dampers (GHTMD), for the reduction of floor vibrations due to human movements. The TMD introduced uses a continuously variable semi-active damper (ground-hook damper) to achieve reduction in the floor acceleration. Here, the GHTMD is applied to a single degree of freedom system representative of building floors. The GHTMD design parameters are defined in terms of non-dimensional values. The optimum values of these parameters are found based on the minimization of the acceleration response of the floor for different GHTMD mass ratios and floor damping ratios. The performance of the GHTMD is compared to that of the equivalent passive TMD. In addition, the effects of off-tuning due to variations in the mass ratios and frequency ratios of the TMD and GHTMD are studied. Comparison of the results demonstrates the efficiency and robustness of GHTMD with respect to equivalent TMD. Finally, a guide for the design of GHTMDs is presented.Key words: floor vibrations, semi-active tuned mass dampers, tuned vibration absorbers, vibration control, ground-hook dampers, human-induced vibrations, annoying vibrations, optimum design parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it