MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008322851 · doi:10.1021/bp025758w

Metabolite Profiles and Growth Characteristics of Rhizobium meliloti Cultivated at Different Specific Growth Rates

2003· article· en· W2008322851 on OpenAlexaff
Lawrence Ong, Yen‐Han Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueBiotechnology Progress · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLegume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemostatGrowth ratePropionateCitric acid cycleBiochemistryFermentationTricarboxylic acidSubstrate (aquarium)MetaboliteBacteriaBiomass (ecology)ChemistryBacterial growthBiologyMetabolism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rhizobium meliloti (ATCC 55340) was grown at different specific growth rates in a chemostat apparatus. Metabolic products, relating to the Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas (EMP) pathway and the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, were measured and quantified to probe the influence of specific growth rate on the distribution of important metabolites. The detection of propionate in the fermentation broth implies that the imbalance of reducing equivalents of FADH(2) and NADH + H(+) resulted in a partially reductive operation of the TCA cycle. Additionally, experimental results show that the specific growth rate plays an essential role in modulating the biomass concentration, the specific substrate uptake rate, the cell length, the specific exopolysaccharide (EPS) production rate, the distribution of EPS molecular weight, and the profiles of carbohydrate and organic acid. The specific EPS production rate (varying from 13.3 to 111 mg EPS/g-DW/h) follows a growth-associated pattern at the specific growth rate ranging from 0.06 to 0.20 h(-1) and switches into non-growth-associated mode when the specific growth rate is over 0.20 h(-1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiotechnology ProgressSame topicLegume Nitrogen Fixing SymbiosisFrench-language works237,207