MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008333556 · doi:10.1021/ja048862d

Two-Stage Dispersion Polymerization toward Monodisperse, Controlled Micrometer-Sized Copolymer Particles

2004· article· en· W2008333556 on OpenAlexaff
Jing-She Song, Frédéric Tronc, Mitchell A. Winnik

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDispersityDispersion polymerizationChemistryCopolymerPolymerizationMonomerDispersion (optics)MicrometerParticle sizeParticle (ecology)Polymer chemistryPolymerNucleationChemical engineeringReagentOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a two-stage dispersion polymerization process to prepare monodisperse micrometer-sized polymer particles in which problematic reagents, such as functional monomers and cross-linkers that commonly disrupt the particle-forming process, were added to the reaction after the nucleation stage was complete. Comonomers added after this point became incorporated into the particles without disturbing the final particle size and size distribution. In this way dye-labeled or functional group-containing micrometer-sized particles with a very narrow size distribution were prepared. By varying the amount of monomer added in the second stage, the final particle diameter could be controlled precisely. Most important of all, this synthetic strategy allowed us to prepare cross-linked particles containing up to 3 mol % cross-linking agent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations219
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207