MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008333556 · doi:10.1021/ja048862d

Two-Stage Dispersion Polymerization toward Monodisperse, Controlled Micrometer-Sized Copolymer Particles

2004· article· en· W2008333556 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDispersityDispersion polymerizationChemistryCopolymerPolymerizationMonomerDispersion (optics)MicrometerParticle sizeParticle (ecology)Polymer chemistryPolymerNucleationChemical engineeringReagentOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a two-stage dispersion polymerization process to prepare monodisperse micrometer-sized polymer particles in which problematic reagents, such as functional monomers and cross-linkers that commonly disrupt the particle-forming process, were added to the reaction after the nucleation stage was complete. Comonomers added after this point became incorporated into the particles without disturbing the final particle size and size distribution. In this way dye-labeled or functional group-containing micrometer-sized particles with a very narrow size distribution were prepared. By varying the amount of monomer added in the second stage, the final particle diameter could be controlled precisely. Most important of all, this synthetic strategy allowed us to prepare cross-linked particles containing up to 3 mol % cross-linking agent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.620

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it