MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008368042 · doi:10.1063/1.2901141

Low-temperature emission in dilute GaAsN alloys grown by metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy

2008· article· en· W2008368042 on OpenAlexaff
G. Bentoumi, Zakia Yaiche, R. Leonelli, J.-N. Beaudry, P. Desjardins, R. A. Masut

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalUniversité de MontréalRegroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de Pointe
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpitaxyAnnealing (glass)NitrogenExcitonMetalorganic vapour phase epitaxyMaterials sciencePhotoluminescenceChemical vapor depositionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Band gapVapor phaseChemistryOptoelectronicsCondensed matter physicsNanotechnologyMetallurgyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have investigated the optical emission from GaAs1−xNx epilayers with 4.3×10−4<x<0.012. The samples were grown on GaAs(001) substrates by metal-organic vapor phase epitaxy using dimethylhydrazine as the nitrogen precursor. We find that the incorporation of nitrogen in GaAs generates deep radiative centers at around 250meV below the GaAsN band gap. The defects associated with these centers can be eliminated through an optimization of the growth temperature and reactor pressure, and by postgrowth annealing at 700°C. We also find that, contrary to what was suggested by Makimoto et al. [Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 2984 (1997)], the near-gap emission located close to 25meV below the gap is not related to a free-to-bound transition even in the samples with the lowest nitrogen content. Rather, we associate this emission to excitons bound to overlapping nitrogen clusters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.874

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207