MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008371908 · doi:10.1177/1077699013519914

Book Review: <i>American Culture Transformed: Dialing 9/11</i> , by Priscilla L. Walton and Bruce Tucker

2014· article· en· W2008371908 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rosanne V. Pagano

Bibliographic record

VenueJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary History and Strategy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryClassicsArtMedia studiesSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

American Culture Transformed: Dialing 9/11. Priscilla L. Walton and Bruce Tucker. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. 200 pp. $25 pbk.At the intersection of semiotics and sociology, where competing histories and conflict- ing frames of reference give rise to meaning and mythology, is a post-9/11 America littered with angels, demons, and a lot of spin. Co-authors Walton and Tucker sift through a series of cultural icons-from Enron to Abu Ghraib, from Martha Stewart to Michael Moore-for clues to a central paradox: How did the terror attacks of September 11, 2001-among history's most complex geopolitical acts-topple America's toler- ance for pluralism in public discourse and replace it with a need for simplistic answers.Walton is an English professor at Carleton University and editor of the Canadian Review of American Studies. Tucker is a history professor at the University of Windsor whose current research examines the revolutionary tradition in modern American political culture.Offering case studies from business, politics, the arts, and the military, American Culture Transformed: Dialing 9/11 distills the media's role in shaping and perpetuat- ing a society that, the authors believe, suffers from post-traumatic stress. Diagnosis is based on what Walton and Tucker view as initial silence in the public square followed by a nationalist master supplied by the Bush administration: Only a very few mainstream narratives ran counter, Walton and Tucker observe. They suggest that lack of dialogue made it possible for voters to accept government overreaching, such as the rush to pass the Patriot Act of 2001.Dialing 9/11 opens with a concise chapter that situates the authors' methodology beside work by thinkers as unlike as Jonathan Safran Foer, Susan Faludi, Slavoj Zizek, Don DeLillo, and Al Gore, among others. Walton and Tucker go on to identify our post-9/11 craving for simple and single 'truths' and show how this desire permeates American culture today. Insisting on a singular Truth is dangerous, Walton and Tucker warn, because it disregards important contradictions inherent in the terror attacks them- selves: We (believe) things are 'extremely complicated' . . . that we are all complicit in 9/11, and that the tragedy must be placed in context. Subsequent chapters analyze representative icons and reveal how parts of the story become the whole story.The book is not another treatise on why news media favor easy explanations and dupe the rest of us. Instead Walton and Tucker present a more layered view-one that deserves wide notice despite occasional unclear writing. For instance, a thoughtful section on bankruptcies of meaning concludes that while there may very well be constant slippages of meanings, and a postmodern play always/already at work, when it comes to translating that play into finances, war, and religion (among other areas), its interpretational aspect must be foregrounded. Syntax becomes clear a sentence or so later when we learn that Enron's failure only goes to show what happens when truth and the interpretation of truth become one-for-one replacements.A closer look at one case history offers a glimpse into how evidence is marshaled overall. Spinning and Counter-spinning compares reductionist accounts that attached to Army Private Jessica Lynch and Army Reservist Lynndie England following Lynch's rescue as a prisoner of war in Iraq and England's court martial in connection with the torture of Iraqi inmates at Abu Ghraib prison.(Lynch) did not create her own narrative, Walton and Tucker observe. It was written for her, and as the media invented and reinvented her persona . . . (they) may well have moved the captivity narrative into a new form of mythmaking. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.425
Threshold uncertainty score0.914

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournalism & Mass Communication QuarterlySame topicMilitary History and StrategyFrench-language works237,207