MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008410748 · doi:10.1260/0309-524x.39.2.193

Wind Resource Assessment in Complex Urban Environment

2015· article· en· W2008410748 on OpenAlexaffabout
Djordje Romanić, Ashkan Rasouli, Horia Hangan

Bibliographic record

VenueWind Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWind powerEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyResource (disambiguation)Marine engineeringCivil engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A wind energy assessment methodology is proposed for urban environments and applied for a specific urban development. Micro-scale wind energy maps are created using computational fluid dynamics simulations. The wind maps are used to calculate the available wind energy for the 2015 Pan American Games Athletes' Village, in Toronto, Canada. The structure of the urban boundary layer has also been analyzed. It is shown that the maximum available energy can cover an important ratio of typical power requirements for the buildings. However, it is found that existing wind turbines have power curves that are de-coupled from the probability density functions of the wind availability. Therefore, the need for designing new urban wind turbines is discussed and required specifications are highlighted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWind EngineeringSame topicWind and Air Flow StudiesFrench-language works237,207