Multiscale tip asymptotics in hydraulic fracture with leak-off
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper is concerned with an analysis of the near-tip region of a fluid-driven fracture propagating in a permeable saturated rock. The analysis is carried out by considering the stationary problem of a semi-infinite fracture moving at constant speedV. Two basic dissipative processes are taken into account: fracturing of the rock and viscous flow in the fracture, and two fluid balance mechanisms are considered – leak-off and storage of the fracturing fluid in the fracture. It is shown that the solution is characterized by a multiscale singular behaviour at the tip, and that the nature of the dominant singularity depends both on the relative importance of the dissipative processes and on the scale of reference. This solution provides a framework to understand the interaction of representative physical processes near the fracture tip, as well as to track the changing nature of the dominant tip process(es) with the tip velocity and its impact on the global fracture response. Furthermore, it gives a universal scaling of the near-tip processes on the scale of the entire fracture and sets the foundation for developing efficient numerical algorithms relying on accurate modelling of the tip region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".