MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008504451 · doi:10.1093/ps/81.5.670

Effect of enzyme addition on the performance and gastrointestinal tract size of chicks fed lupin seed and their fractions

2002· article· en· W2008504451 on OpenAlexaff
A. Brenes, R.R. Marquardt, W. Guenter, A. Viveros

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGizzardBroilerDry matterBiologyAnimal scienceFeed conversion ratioWeight gainFood scienceBody weightAgronomyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three experiments were conducted to study the effects of adding a crude enzyme preparation to diets containing whole, dehulled lupins and lupin hulls on performance, dry matter retention (DMR), AME, apparent protein digestibility (APD), and size of gastrointestinal tract of Leghorn and broiler chicks. In the first experiment, Leghorn chicks fed diets containing up to 70% whole lupins showed a depression in the performance. Progressive decreases in DMR (up to 30.2%), AME (up to 6.5%), and APD (up to 6.5%) and an increase in the relative gizzard weight (18.8%) were observed with increasing concentration of lupins (23.1, 46.9, and 70%) in the diet. Enzyme supplementation of diets containing lupins significantly improved the performance of the chicks. DMR and AME were improved by 4.2 and 3.1, respectively, and gizzard size was reduced (7.1%) by addition of the enzymes. In the second experiment, addition of 11.2 and 22.4% of lupin hulls to a dehulled lupin diet resulted in a dramatic depression in chick performance, with values ranging from 6.3% for feed consumption to 60.5% for fed to gain ratio, and an increase in the relative organ weight (up to 29.9%) and length (35.6%). These effects were partially counteracted by the action of enzymes. In the third experiment, increasing concentration of whole lupins (15, 35, and 45%) in broiler chicken diets caused a depression in the performance of birds fed 35 and 45% whole lupins as compared to those fed the wheat-soy diet. In contrast, 15% lupins improved weight gains compared to that obtained with the nonlupin diets. The lower content of lupins in the diet also had no or little effect on other performance values compared to the control group, whereas 35 and 45% dietary lupins tended to have negative effects. Likewise, increasing lupin content in the diet produced an enlargement in the relative size of several sections of the gastrointestinal tract. Enzyme supplementation of lupin diets improved weight gain (5.5%) and feed consumption (3.8%) with the values being similar to those obtained with the wheat-soy diet. Moreover, the enzymes also reduced the relative size of digestive organs from 5.3% for pancreas to 22.2% for crop. In summary, lupins appear to contain fibrous components that reduce the performance of the birds and increase the size of the gastrointestinal tract. The addition of enzymes counteracted these negative effects in birds fed whole, dehulled lupins and lupin hull diets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207