MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008519152 · doi:10.1002/wics.128

Geometry in statistics

2010· review· en· W2008519152 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Vos, Paul Marriott

Bibliographic record

VenueWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInformation geometryStatistical inferenceNonparametric statisticsEuclidean geometryGeometryComputer scienceFocus (optics)InferenceMathematicsStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Geometry is a broad area that has applications to many areas of statistics. In this article the focus will be on the role of dual information geometries to statistical inference. A great deal of research has been done in the application of these dual geometries to higher order asymptotics and a brief review is given. Greater attention is given to providing insight into dual geometries as extensions of Euclidean geometry, and how, a further extension, called the dual simplicial geometry, can provide a general framework for computational algorithms. WIREs Comp Stat 2010 2 686–694 DOI: 10.1002/wics.128 This article is categorized under: Statistical and Graphical Methods of Data Analysis > Information Theoretic Methods Statistical and Graphical Methods of Data Analysis > Nonparametric Methods

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.008
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational StatisticsSame topicBayesian Methods and Mixture ModelsFrench-language works237,207