MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2008529382 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m105850200

A Novel Hybrid Open Reading Frame Formed by Multiple Cellular Gene Transductions by a Plant Long Terminal Repeat Retroelement

2001· article· en· W2008529382 on OpenAlexaff
Nabil Elrouby, Thomas E. Bureau

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetrotransposonBiologyLong terminal repeatTransposable elementGeneGeneticsTransduction (biophysics)Open reading frameRetrovirusMobile genetic elementsComputational biologyGenomePeptide sequence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The discovery that vertebrate retroviruses could transduce cellular sequences was central to cancer etiology and research. Although not well documented, transduction of cellular sequences by retroelements has been suggested to modify cellular functions. The maize Bs1 transposon was the first non-vertebrate retroelement reported to have transduced a portion of a cellular gene (c-pma). We show that Bs1 has, in addition, transduced portions of at least two more maize cellular genes, namely for 1,3-beta-glucanase (c-bg) and 1,4-beta-xylan endohydrolase (c-xe). We also show that Bs1 has maintained a truncated gag domain with similarity to the magellan gypsy-like long terminal repeat retrotransposon and a region that may correspond to an env-like domain. Our findings suggest that, like oncogenic retroviruses, the three transduced gene fragments and the Bs1 gag domain encode a fusion protein that has the potential to be expressed. We suggest that transduction by retroelements may facilitate the formation of novel hybrid genes in plants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological Chemistry→Same topicChromosomal and Genetic Variations→French-language works237,207→