MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008530066 · doi:10.1109/tie.2013.2263778

Analysis and Implementation of a Single-Stage Flyback PV Microinverter With Soft Switching

2013· article· en· W2008530066 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlyback transformerSolar micro-inverterInverterCapacitorTransformerFlyback diodeVoltageElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringComputer scienceMaterials scienceEngineeringMaximum power point tracking

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel zero-voltage switching (ZVS) approach to a grid-connected single-stage flyback inverter. The soft-switching of the primary switch is achieved by allowing negative current from the grid side through bidirectional switches placed on the secondary side of the transformer. Basically, the negative current discharges the metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor's output capacitor, thereby allowing turn on of the primary switch under zero voltage. To optimize the amount of reactive current required to achieve ZVS, a variable-frequency control scheme is implemented over the line cycle. In addition, the bidirectional switches on the secondary side of the transformer have ZVS during the turn- on times. Therefore, the switching losses of the bidirectional switches are negligible. A 250-W prototype has been implemented to validate the proposed scheme. Experimental results confirm the feasibility and superior performance of the converter compared with the conventional flyback inverter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.662
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it