Découvertes récentes sur la fonction et la plasticité des voies dopaminergiques du cerveau
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite the fact that the neurotransmitter dopamine was discovered more than 50 years ago, we still have limited knowledge of its physiological and pathological roles. Recent work has unveiled novel and surprising properties of dopamine neurons and of other key players involved in regulating the dopamine system. For example, the integration of the dopamine signal by its receptors depends on many proteins of diverse signaling pathways and also of other types of receptors that interact with and regulate dopamine receptors: many new promising interactions have been reported during the past few years. Also, we are beginning to discover that chronic treatment with dopamine receptor ligands or other molecules affecting dopaminergic pathways induce long-term molecular, structural and functional rearrangements that could ultimately force us to revisit the mechanism of action of established therapeutic agents. Finally, the discovery of glutamate co-release by dopamine neurons is leading us to reconsider some keys aspects of dopamine neuron physiology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".