MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Correction: A Whole-Cell Biosensor for the Detection of Gold

2014· article· en· W2008541368 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Carla M. Zammit, Davide Quaranta, Shane Gibson, Anita Zaitouna, Christine Ta, Joël Brugger, Rebecca Y. Lai, Gregor Grass, Frank Reith

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicbioluminescence and chemiluminescence research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of AdelaideCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationBarrick Gold Corporation
KeywordsBiosensorComputational biologyComputer scienceBioinformaticsNanotechnologyBiologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Geochemical exploration for gold (Au) is becoming increasingly important to the mining industry.Current processes for Au analyses require sampling materials to be taken from often remote localities.Samples are then transported to a laboratory equipped with suitable analytical facilities, such as Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) or Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis (INAA).Determining the concentration of Au in samples may take several weeks, leading to long delays in exploration campaigns.Hence, a method for the on-site analysis of Au, such as a biosensor, will greatly benefit the exploration industry.The golTSB genes from Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium are selectively induced by Au(I/III)-complexes.In the present study, the golTSB operon with a reporter gene, lacZ, was introduced into Escherichia coli.The induction of golTSB::lacZ with Au(I/III)-complexes was tested using a colorimetric b-galactosidase and an electrochemical assay.Measurements of the b-galactosidase activity for concentrations of both Au(I)-and Au(III)-complexes ranging from 0.1 to 5 mM (equivalent to 20 to 1000 ng g 21 or parts-per-billion (ppb)) were accurately quantified.When testing the ability of the biosensor to detect Au(I/III)-complexes (aq) in the presence of other metal ions (Ag(I), Cu(II), Fe(III), Ni(II), Co(II), Zn, As(III), Pb(II), Sb(III) or Bi(III)), cross-reactivity was observed, i.e. the amount of Au measured was either underor over-estimated.To assess if the biosensor would work with natural samples, soils with different physiochemical properties were spiked with Au-complexes.Subsequently, a selective extraction using 1 M thiosulfate was applied to extract the Au.The results showed that Au could be measured in these extracts with the same accuracy as ICP-MS (P,0.05).This demonstrates that by combining selective extraction with the biosensor system the concentration of Au can be accurately measured, down to a quantification limit of 20 ppb (0.1 mM) and a detection limit of 2 ppb (0.01 mM).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.058
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.058
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1380.071

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONESame topicbioluminescence and chemiluminescence researchFrench-language works237,207