MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008559508 · doi:10.1029/2010eo010002

Calderas Bottom‐to‐Top: An Online Seminar and Field Trip

2010· article· en· W2008559508 on OpenAlexaff
Jack Wilcock, Marc‐Antoine Longpré, J. Maarten de Moor, Jake Ross, Matthew J. Zimmerer

Bibliographic record

VenueEos · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalderaGeologyVolcanoMagma chamberCrustEarth scienceMagmaGeologistVolcanologySeismologyGeothermal gradientGeochemistryGeophysicsPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Caldera‐related processes have deep implications in Earth science and are important to the general public. To the geologist, calderas are surface manifestations of large magma reservoirs and the source of some of the largest eruptions on Earth. For society, these volcanoes represent not only an extreme volcanic hazard but also a potential source of abundant geothermal energy and metal ore deposits. During February–April 2009, an innovative, online course entitled “Calderas: Bottom‐to‐top” was offered across several universities to students interested in investigating caldera‐forming processes associated with “supervolcanoes.” Supervolcanoes have the ability to spew hundreds to thousands of cubic kilometers of material from large magma chambers pooled in the Earth's crust. A caldera‐forming eruption results from overpressurization of the chamber and leads to formation of large depressions, tens of kilometers in diameter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1410.049

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEosSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207