Comparação entre indivíduos hemiparéticos com e sem histórico de quedas com base nos componentes da Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar hemiparéticos com e sem histórico de quedas nos últimos seis meses (caidores e não-caidores) segundo os componentes da Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde. Dezesseis hemiparéticos não-caidores (62,3±16,6 anos), com tempo de acidente vascular encefálico (AVE) de 38,0±48,3 meses, e 16 caidores (61,0±17,0 anos), tempo de AVE de 48,0±50,7 meses, de ambos os sexos, comunitários e deambuladores, foram avaliados quanto a funções e estruturas do corpo (torque do músculo quadríceps do lado parético e escala de depressão geriátrica), atividade - velocidade de marcha (VM) natural e máxima, teste de levantar e caminhar cronometrado (timed up & go) e escala de equilíbrio de Berg - e participação (pelo perfil de saúde de Nottingham e escala de qualidade de vida específica para AVE). Os dados foram tratados estatisticamente, com nível de significância α<0,05. Não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos quanto à idade, sexo e tempo de AVE (0,56
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".