MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Salpingo-oophorectomy and the Risk of Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneal Cancers in Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation

2006· article· en· W2008583417 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOvarian cancerOophorectomyHazard ratioGynecologyFallopian tubeIncidence (geometry)Fallopian tube cancerConfidence intervalObstetricsCancer registryCancerInternal medicineHysterectomySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Women with adverse mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene are at an increased lifetime risk of ovarian cancer, and these mutations also increase vulnerability to cancers of the fallopian tube and peritoneum. Risk levels were examined in a prospective study based on data from an international registry comprising 32 centers in Canada, the United States, Europe, and Israel. The 1828 women identified as carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation were followed up for a mean of 3.5 years. Participants had a mean age at entry of 47 years. Approximately three-fourths of the women carried a BRCA1 mutation and about one-fourth, a BRCA2 mutation; eight individuals carried both. Nearly one-third of women in the study (30.4%) had undergone bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy before entering the study, and another 38.5% had an oophorectomy during follow-up. Fifty incident cancers were discovered during follow-up. Thirty-two of these cancers developed in women with intact ovaries. Eleven cancers were identified at the time of prophylactic oophorectomy, and 7 others after this procedure. The cumulative incidence of peritoneal cancer was estimated at 4.3% two decades after oophorectomy. The overall adjusted reduction in cancer risk associated with bilateral oophorectomy was 80%, with a multivariate hazard ratio of 0.2 and a 95% confidence interval of 0.07–0.58 (Fig. 1). The risk of ovarian, tubal, and primary peritoneal cancers in women with intact ovaries was highest for those 60–70 years of age who carried the BRCA1 mutation. Based on estimated incidence rates for women having both ovaries intact, the estimated penetrance of ovarian cancer was 62% up to age 75 years for carriers of the BRCA1 mutation, and 18% up to age 75 for those carrying the BRCA2 mutation.Fig. 1: Estimated risk of ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers with and without oophorectomy. (Reproduced with permission. JAMA 2006;296:185–192. Copyright © 2006, American Medical Association. All rights reserved.)The investigators conclude that the risk of ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancer is lowered by 80% for carriers of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation who undergo prophylactic oophorectomy. The findings support prophylactic surgery as a very effective risk reduction measure. Both the ovaries and the fallopian tubes should be removed. The residual risk of peritoneal cancer is not high enough to recommend against prophylactic surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it