MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008602929 · doi:10.1109/newcas.2012.6328968

FPGA-implementation of pipelined neural network for power amplifier modeling

2012· article· en· W2008602929 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Amplifier Design
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayComputer scienceBasebandGate arrayArtificial neural networkCritical path methodAmplifierPower (physics)Parallel computingComputer hardwareArtificial intelligenceBandwidth (computing)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

FPGA-Implementation of pipelined real-valued time-delay neural network (RVTDNN) for power amplifier modeling is presented in this paper. Pipelined and pseudo-conventional RVTDNN architectures are implemented on their parallel forms to exploit the inherent concurrent computing tasks of field programmable gate array (FPGA). The proposed pipelined architecture is based on the delayed back-propagation learning algorithm for adaptive correction of neuron weights and biases. The proposed pipelined RVTDNN has a reduced critical path and an increased maximum operating frequency to 6.5 times faster than pseudo-conventional RVTDNN. Results obtained with both RVTDNN models using a modulated 16-QAM baseband signal are very close to those obtained comparing with the reference model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Power Amplifier DesignFrench-language works237,207