Characterization of Dye-Decolorizing Peroxidases from <i>Rhodococcus jostii</i> RHA1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The soil bacterium Rhodococcus jostii RHA1 contains two dye-decolorizing peroxidases (DyPs) named according to the subfamily they represent: DypA, predicted to be periplasmic, and DypB, implicated in lignin degradation. Steady-state kinetic studies of these enzymes revealed that they have much lower peroxidase activities than C- and D-type DyPs. Nevertheless, DypA showed 6-fold greater apparent specificity for the anthraquinone dye Reactive Blue 4 (k(cat)/K(m) = 12800 ± 600 M(-1) s(-1)) than either ABTS or pyrogallol, consistent with previously characterized DyPs. By contrast, DypB showed the greatest apparent specificity for ABTS (k(cat)/K(m) = 2000 ± 100 M(-1) s(-1)) and also oxidized Mn(II) (k(cat)/K(m) = 25.1 ± 0.1 M(-1) s(-1)). Further differences were detected using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy: while both DyPs contained high-spin (S = (5)/(2)) Fe(III) in the resting state, DypA had a rhombic high-spin signal (g(y) = 6.32, g(x) = 5.45, and g(z) = 1.97) while DypB had a predominantly axial signal (g(y) = 6.09, g(x) = 5.45, and g(z) = 1.99). Moreover, DypA reacted with H(2)O(2) to generate an intermediate with features of compound II (Fe(IV)═O). By contrast, DypB reacted with H(2)O(2) with a second-order rate constant of (1.79 ± 0.06) × 10(5) M(-1) s(-1) to generate a relatively stable green-colored intermediate (t(1/2) ∼ 9 min). While the electron absorption spectrum of this intermediate was similar to that of compound I of plant-type peroxidases, its EPR spectrum was more consistent with a poorly coupled protein-based radical than with an [Fe(IV)═O Por(•)](+) species. The X-ray crystal structure of DypB, determined to 1.4 Å resolution, revealed a hexacoordinated heme iron with histidine and a solvent species occupying axial positions. A solvent channel potentially provides access to the distal face of the heme for H(2)O(2). A shallow pocket exposes heme propionates to the solvent and contains a cluster of acidic residues that potentially bind Mn(II). Insight into the structure and function of DypB facilitates its engineering for the improved degradation of lignocellulose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".